View Full Version : Location, location, location
bobrfish
10-25-2006, 9:35 AM
A thread was lost recently.
A newcomer asked why ACA does not have conventions in a central location year after year. Or a
similar question.
If this newcomer is still about, please repost here or start a new
thread.
ccones
10-28-2006, 6:27 AM
Well,,, I am here, but now I am
scared to stay it again, I was not saying the ACA was doing anything bad with the West or East
coast locations. I just suggested using a Central location so that the travel to the Convention is
easier for everyone. At our Bonsai Conventions ( yes I torture little trees) when we have them
Centrally located, our attendance is much higher. I mentioned this was not meant to be a bashing or
a pitty pary, just an intrest in what others thought. the Newbe
You have a good point Ccones,
and the success of the Chicago ACA this year was due in part to location (and equally because it
was a very well organized convention... thank you GCCA!).
The reason the convention
is not held in the same general every year is because the ACA is dependent upon a hosting club to
put on the event. Most of the work to do an ACA convention is done locally, and it is a lot of
work. A local club will bid to get the convention because they want to host one, and because the
host club earns a portion of the money generated. So the ACA convention goes where it is
wanted.
Having the event in different places has its advantages too. Local clubs get
the opportunity to show off their cities and we visitors get a chance to go to a different part of
the country. I think that if the ACA were to centrally locate the convention every year we would
lose some of the interest from other ares fo the country, especially now that there are several
larger clubs that host awesome events of their own every year (OCA, GCCA, MCA, Pittsburgh to name a
very few). All those shows are in the same city every year and regional crowds.
bobrfish
10-28-2006, 10:50 AM
CCONES It was an excellent
question. I did not find it bashing, disrespectful or detrimental in any manner.
In
addition to what Ted wrote.
ACA BOT seeks to move the convention to areas that have not had a
convention for some time. If two host clubs bid, one will lose the bid. In some cases the losing
host club may have hosted a bigger and perhaps better convention.
Those cities in the
West have cool cichlids and want to show them off. Traveling long distances with big fish is risky
and expensive. In general, fish keepers are like cheap everything including rooms, travel, food,
beer, etc.
As Ted said, some cichlid keepers would not attend an ACA convention if it
were not in their city or close.
As for membership density. I believe New York is #1
and New Jersey #2. Other states with many members include Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania. If we
wanted to max the convention size, we would hold it somewhere amongst the dense membership. I
predict ACA would slowly lose members from distance cities if we did this.
Lisachromis
10-28-2006, 9:24 PM
We need to do one in
winter in Florida... they'll come just for the weather. LOL
bobrfish
10-28-2006, 10:28 PM
I would love to visit
Southern Florida during January http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif
Big_Kill
10-30-2006, 2:04 AM
I think that it is a good
thing that it is in a different location every year. As Ted stated, it gives people a chance to
visit different parts of the country. I think part of the reason some people go every year is
because they get to visit somewhere new. One of the reasons i drove nearly 4,000 miles roundtrip
this year was because i have never been to Chicago before and wanted to visit that city. Of course
the convention was the main reason i went but i also made a vacation out of it with my dad and my
cousin. My traveling partners were not even ACA members but i convinced them to go with me so we
could go to a Cubs game, blues club, deep dish pizza, Field museum, etc. Personally it is good for
me because i live in Washington state and if they were held where the membership is most dense i
would have to fly every year and it would be very expensive. Sacramento is only about a 10 or 11
hour drive from me so i am very excited about next year. I like to be able to drive because i like
to bring fish to and from the convention. Kyle
Patrick Kelly
10-30-2006, 6:55 AM
Very well stated,
everyone.
My first one was Cin. Ohio. I had to work and drove out Friday afternoon and
home Sunday afternoon.
8 hour drive or so each way. It was too hecktic that way.
Since that year I also make it a vacation. I usually show up on Tuesday and explore. Then fly
home on Monday.
In Denver, I spent two days in Aspen.
In Fortworth I just rented a car
and drove around.
This year I spent Wed down town doing the tourist thing. Checking out the
Sears tower and the city.
This year I plan on flying to California on Monday renting a car
driving north to see the Redwood trees and such. Then who knows. I have never been to
California so to me that is a big part of it. Makes it easier to get the wife to go also.
The amount of work that it must take to put it on, would make it impossible to get people to do
it every year. They would burn out.
For me a lot of it is seeing the
different parts of the country too. The convention is my yearly get-away, so I'm always
excited to hear where the next one is going to be when it is announced.
I always fly since I
don't carry the massive amounts of fish that many people do (except maybe coming back...), so
it's just a matter of driving a couple of miles to the airport and I'm almost there. http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif
I think so far, Denver was my
favorite location, and Chicago was about the most meticulously planned out one I've been to.
Hats off to all of the clubs who take on the huge challenge of hosting the convention each
year. http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif I can't even imagine
all of the work that goes into it....
Big_Kill
11-01-2006, 4:06 AM
Chicago was my first
convention so i dont have anything to compare it to but i was extremely impressed with the job that
the GCCA did.
Patrick Kelly
11-01-2006, 8:17 AM
<div
class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'>i was extremely impressed with
the job that the GCCA did</div>
That was only my 4th one,
but I would agree. It was, by far, my best yet.
sumpnfishy
11-20-2006, 4:54 PM
You have to remember too
that some people simply can't afford to fly to the conventions. I'm in Kansas City, so I
love the idea of centrally located conventions because I can drive. But if I was on the East or
West coast I would probably never have the opportunity to go to a centrally located convention
because I can't afford to fly to them. Moving the convention around gives a lot of members an
opportunity they might not otherwise have.
Michael
fishfarm
11-21-2006, 8:38 AM
Micheal, Get your local
club to bid for 2009, then it'd be right in town! Ken
dstuer
11-21-2006, 2:27 PM
<!--quoteo(post=3013:date=Nov
21 2006, 10:38 AM:name=fishfarm)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(fishfarm @ Nov 21 2006,
10:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> (index.php?act=findpost&pid=3013)</div><div
class='quotemain'>Micheal, Get your local club to bid for 2009, then it'd be
right in town! Ken</div>
I like Lisa's idea about Fl
in winter, with a collecting trip to help rid Fl of those pesky exotics.
fishfarm
11-22-2006, 8:23 AM
The convention guidelines
call for July as it's the best time of year for people to travel. Ken
Big_Kill
11-22-2006, 7:39 PM
<!--quoteo
(post=3013:date=Nov 21 2006, 06:38 AM:name=fishfarm)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(fishfarm
@ Nov 21 2006, 06:38 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=3013"><{POST_SNAPBACK}
></a></div><div class='quotemain'>Micheal, Get your local club to bid for 2009, then
it'd be right in town! Ken</div>
yeah KC would
be cool. Ken, why did you say 2009? Has 2008 been chosen already?
bobrfish
11-22-2006, 8:48 PM
<!--quoteo(post=3042:date=Nov
22 2006, 07:39 PM:name=Big_Kill)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Big_Kill @ Nov 22 2006,
07:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> (index.php?act=findpost&pid=3042)</div><div
class='quotemain'>yeah KC would be cool. Ken, why did you say 2009? Has 2008 been
chosen already?</div>
http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif
Yeah throw a bid in for 2008. It
would be good to see a couple of clubs competing.
http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif
Well, after taking a look at the
plane fares to Sacramento (almost $800 for me), I had to make the hard decision to skip the
2007 convention, for the first time since I've started going. http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif
The rest of my friends who I meet up with there are
also in the same boat for this one.....
I sure hope the ticket prices come down by next
year, or that it's in a more central location....
So much for me saying that I like to see
the different parts of the country every year when the prices skyrocketed like that.
<!--quoteo(post=3325:date=Dec 14
2006, 04:30 PM:name=JanS)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(JanS @ Dec 14 2006, 04:30
PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> (index.php?act=findpost&pid=3325)</div><div
class='quotemain'>Well, after taking a look at the plane fares to Sacramento (almost
$800 for me), I had to make the hard decision to skip the 2007 convention, for the first time
since I've started going. http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif
The rest of my friends who I meet up with there are
also in the same boat for this one.....
I sure hope the ticket prices come down by next
year, or that it's in a more central location....
So much for me saying that I like to see
the different parts of the country every year when the prices skyrocketed like that.<!--QuoteEnd--
></div>
A search on nwa.com (seems Northwest is the only airline to fly
out of Duluth, came up with prices of $569).
Or you could do a round trip to Chicago for
$265 and pick up the $89 Southwest Flights. That's $265 + $180 giving you a
total price of $445. The only problem is that Southwest is only booking through May 10th right
now. http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif
Tim
bobrfish
12-15-2006, 8:34 AM
I will likely fly from MSP to
SMF.
Prices vary from $430 for one stop flights to $490 non stop.
Travel
dates also enfluence the price.
I hadn't even checked out of
Duluth since I didn't think it would be much less than Hibbing. Huh...
I did check MSP,
but that would involve extra time off from work for the driving time, so it would still wind up
costing almost as much.
I will have to keep Duluth in mind though. Thanks for the tip.
http://cichlid.ipbhost.com/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif
Big_Kill
12-15-2006, 9:20 PM
<!--quoteo
(post=3325:date=Dec 14 2006, 01:30 PM:name=JanS)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(JanS @
Dec 14 2006, 01:30 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=3325"><{POST_SNAPBACK}
></a></div><div class='quotemain'>almost $800 for me</div><!--
QuoteEEnd-->
Wow! I thought you could go anywhere in America roundtrip for a lot
less than that. I flew from Spokane, Washington to Bangor, Maine for way less than that.
fishfarm
12-19-2006, 9:14 AM
Right now, Atlanta to
Sacramento is only $330 round trip, Gotta look for the deals. Ken
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.